Military Innovations

The evolution of military technology in this alternate timeline departs significantly from our known history, largely as a result of the absence of gunpowder:

Military weapons without gunpowder

Without gunpowder as the core technology behind armaments, weaponmakers explored other scientific principles for warfare innovations. This led to focus on alternative approaches like Hans Christian Ørsted's electromagnetism and Al-Farabi's mechanics. Consequently, armies used various projectile munitions based on those principles.

Development of the static electricity cannon

The static electricity cannon emerged as the primary projectile weapon, propelling its ammunition through controlled electromagnetic forces. By harnessing static electric charge and discharging it rapidly, it became possible to catapult projectiles at high velocities, increasing their range and impact.

Chinese-Mongolian mixture of science and war

This novel approach to warfare was particularly dominant in a powerful Chinese-Mongolian empire, which integrated scientific discoveries into its military capabilities. This empire played a crucial role in the advancement of artillery and siege technologies. Thanks to the static electricity weapons, it enjoyed significant military advantages over its competitors.

Siege machinery and vibration attacks

Siege machinery developed into complex, mechanized contraptions, whose usage required significant training and tactical expertise. By manipulating vibrations, directing controlled static discharges, and employing intricate catapult mechanisms, assault forces were capable of destroying fortifications, breaching city walls, and annihilating their enemies.

Strategic maneuverability was still essential in this new form of warfare. Forces could mount electromagnetic projectile arms on large wheeled carriages or sea-bound ships, allowing engagement of enemy forces from distance or at close range.

Impact on warfare and military strategy

Warfare in this era emphasized mobility and siege-oriented tools, where large-scale armies needed to position themselves effectively and support power-hungry machinery. This transformation in military strategy entailed numerous strategic aspects, such as understanding of enemy layouts, familiarity with the terrain, and coordination between static and mobile forces.

In effect, warfare presented a delicate balance between sustainable tactics, logistical support, and human creativity. As such, the military exploits of this alternate timeline may still instill awe in military historians and experts, showcasing a darker yet fascinating path of technological innovation and its impacts.